Sad Panda

Sad Panda

Share on Facebook22Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Share on Tumblr0Share on Reddit0

Sad Panda (and the Goonies)

Takenoko is, of course, a fantastic game. But the harsh reality is that pandas are basically the Darth Vaders of the animal kingdom.

 

I hadn’t heard any hype at all about publisher Albino Dragon’s ‘Goonies adventure Card Game’. A recent Kickstarter release, the game had managed to escape my attention completely until the most recent Dice Tower episode. Guest contributor Richard ‘Rahdo’ Ham gushed about the game, and in doing so used Pandemic as a comparative.

Good enough for me.

By happy coincidence, Tabletop had just added it, and I’ve just recently come upon an unexpected glut of free time. While I’m sure ‘The Goonies’ holds up as a fun film (probably), I have no great nostalgia for the title, so approached the table without prejudice.

What I discovered was a very straightforward co-op, but one with enough challenge and crunch to make me want to play again after our first defeat. The core mechanic is very simple, but it did take me a while to get my head around.

There are five locations, and the players need to discover the treasure in each location. The treasure must be stored along a path, which first needs to be opened. Obstacles will mount on the locations, and booby traps can be sprung. Meanwhile, an encounter deck will throw up random hindrances, including some ‘Fratelli’ cards – familiar faces to fans of the film. Players will play item cards from their hand, assisted by their characters special abilities, to take actions each round.

Here’s the thing: The players’ item cards and the obstacles that mount on each location are drawn from the same deck. These same cards also correspond to a location, and discarding a card allows movement to that location. Discarding matching symbols (different to locations) allow for obstacles to be removed), and discarding three of a kind allow for a path to be cleared for treasure. You can search a location by discarding any card.

Basically, the game’s engine is a single deck, and the puzzle is in figuring out the optimal use for every card you will draw from that deck. In each round, players can collectively take up to four actions between them – another simple but effective way of ensuring cooperation at all times. There is nothing more frustrating for me than a co-op that doesn’t require the players to actually cooperate in order to win. I see little point or fun in a game like that.

Going back to ‘The Goonies’, the usual Pandemic-a-like rules apply. The game end can trigger for the players in a number of ways: a location having five obstacles on it, a deck running out, etc. The single deck system makes for streamlined play and a really interesting puzzle. I’m only one game in, so replayability is still up in the air for me, but I’ll definitely be giving it a bash again next week, so that’s a good sign.

 

In the meantime, we are finally moving onto the third and final scenario in the Arkham Horror LCG core box, so expect a return to Arkham in next week’s comic. And yes, we did an Arkham comic just a couple of weeks ago, but right now it’s fair to say we’re both a little obsessed with the game, so you will have to bear with us. Or suggest some other games we should be playing in the comments?

10 Comments on Sad Panda
  • Nick Smith

    You’re right, you shouldn’t allow your obsession to make you play the core box again. You should play the Dunwich campaign, currently 5 scenarios of horrendous defeat.

    • Despite how cruel, difficult and traumatic the core box is, we are super-excited to play more! We have been trying to get our hands on the two standalone scenarios, but they are really difficult to get, so we may actually go straight to Dunwich. I am most excited about having more cards to play with, actually, and to really be able to deckbuild with more options. And then having to take it all apart and do it again when I get horribly defeated …

      • Nick Smith

        No need for the standalones – they don’t have any player cards anyway (Well, outside scenario specific ones). I’d very much put them on my ‘Get them when I can’ list, but don’t let it stop you going for Dunwich.

  • Snarkastic Android

    We do have a habit of idealising certain animals…
    http://pbfcomics.com/106/

    • Oh wow, that’s SUPER similar. I hope I didn’t just subconsciously copy that comic …

      • Snarkastic Android

        It’s a good gag – it seems unlikely that it wouldn’t occur to multiple people at different times!

  • Snarkastic Android

    As for other games, I’ve just bought Potion Explosion for my nephew’s birthday (his journey to the nerd-side is nearly complete…), and for a game built around such a simple mechanism (pull marble, trying to make marbles of the same colour touch to get them) the way that completed potions can be used makes for some quite cool combos. It’s a much richer game than the theme would suggest.

    Millenium Blades is also worth a look as a game that is an absolute rabbit hole – it’s a board game where each player is a professional player of a CCG game called Millenium Blades. There are so many different ways to build decks on top of so many ways to set up the starting decks that it feels like you could play it everyday for a year and no game would be alike! I won’t be buying the game, it feels like it’s most rewarding to people who play it often (so get a feel for how cards can combo etc) and I like to mix up what games I play

    • Potion Explosion is one of those games we have been hearing about for ages, but have never had the chance to play. And it looks so gorgeous! Millennium Blades I have also heard of, and it is sure an intriguing concept alright.
      We are going to get to play Pandemic Reign of Cthulhu tonight, actually, which is super-exciting. It sort of combines our two current gaming obsessions: Arkham Horror LCG and Pandemic Legacy.

  • wr00t

    I have tried Takenoko once on BGA, but wasn’t impressed. I guess panda spell is not working on me😎